<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Maybe Tomorrow---Probably Not &#187; marketing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joehankin.com/blog/tag/marketing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joehankin.com/blog</link>
	<description>Now 30% Less Fun!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:05:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Word of the Day: Brand</title>
		<link>http://joehankin.com/blog/2008/08/word-of-the-day-brand/</link>
		<comments>http://joehankin.com/blog/2008/08/word-of-the-day-brand/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Hankin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joehankin.com/blog/?p=95</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[brand (n.): a class of goods identified by name as the product of a single firm or manufacturer. also, a mark made by burning with a hot iron to attest manufacture or quality or to designate ownership That&#8217;s right! I had never put two and two together and associated modern-day &#8220;branding&#8221; using logos and publicists [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>brand (n.): a class of goods identified by name as the product of a single firm or manufacturer. also, a mark made by burning with a hot iron to attest manufacture or quality or to designate ownership</em></p>
<p>That&#8217;s right! I had never put two and two together and associated modern-day &#8220;branding&#8221; using logos and publicists with Wild West-era &#8220;branding&#8221; using a red-hot hunk of metal and a cow&#8217;s ass, but there it is, right there in front of our faces.  Fortunately, modern day branding is only a little bit more painful than the classical kind.  Behold, a survey of some of the silliest, stupidest, and cringe-worthiest brand names of the New Millenium.</p>
<h4><a href="http://www.delicious.com/">del.icio.us</a></h4>
<p>Del.icio.us is a nerd pun based on the fact that there exists a domain suffix .us, every bit as real and legitimate as .com and .org, but easier to work into a dorky name.  The principle of del.icio.us &#8212; tagged online bookmarking &#8212; is brilliant, but as a URL it&#8217;s unusual, it&#8217;s annoying to say out loud, and it doesn&#8217;t always get automatically hyperlinked when typed into an email or some such.  Plus it bears an unseemly resemblance to the moniker of Black Eyed Peas frontman <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Will.i.am">will.i.am</a>.  As a result, del.icio.us came to their senses and moved the whole enterprise to <a href="http://www.delicious.com">delicious.com</a> when they redesigned the site and more or less ruined it.  </p>
<h4><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gnutella">Gnutella</a></h4>
<p>Gnutella is one of the top filesharing networks that has arisen in the post-Napster era.  It&#8217;s the operating network behind such applications as BearShare, Limewire, and Morpheus.  The name Gnutella is a portmanteau of GNU (a freeware operating system; the acronym is recursive, and stands for &#8220;GNU&#8217;s Not Unix,&#8221; which I&#8217;m willing to count as another strike against Gnutella) and <a href="http://www.nutellausa.com/">Nutella</a>, the scrumptious hazelnut spread that should never have been dragged into this.  Granted, Gnutella is a free, open protocol, and so it was named by programmers rather than by marketing guys, but is this really the best they could do?  What about Gnudity?  Gnuroscience?  Gnuremberg? </p>
<h4><a href="http://www.flickr.com/">Flickr</a></h4>
<p>Flickr is one of the largest photo-sharing sites online and the one generally preferred by serious photographers.  Flickr isn&#8217;t the worst name in the world in and of itself, but like Pearl Jam spawning Creed, Flickr can be blamed for the rash of horrific vowel-dropping brands that followed, including <a href="http://www.delivr.com">Delivr</a>, <a href="http://www.tumblr.com">Tumblr</a>, <a href="http://www.colr.org/">Colr</a>, and <a href="http://overcompensating.com/posts/20080818.html">Shittr</a>.  Flickr hasn&#8217;t been at the cutting edge of web technology for a long time, since it was bought by Yahoo!, at least, but it is such a totemic presence on the Web2.0 netscape (ding!) that its name continues to influence new enterprises to this day &#8212; and in fact, entrepreneurs continue to try to push the envelope, in such cases as&#8230;</p>
<h4><a href="http://www.perspctv.com/">Perspctv</a></h4>
<p>God, really?  Perspctv is a political news aggregator that pulls in blog posts, mainstream media articles, and Twitter posts (or &#8220;tweets&#8221;) and displays data sets gleaned from them (and from other sources) in friendly charts.  Perspctv is also arguably the dumbest fancy-pants abbreviation I&#8217;ve ever seen, considering it&#8217;s hard to remember, hard to type, and easy to parse as PerSpc TV.  Even one more E, to make the site Perspectv, would go a long way in making it a more salient brand name, but apparently the allure of XTRM TXT MSSG-SPK was too tempting to pass up.  Hey, Perspctv?  There&#8217;s this new thing called an iPhone/Blackberry/Treo/Sidekick which has rendered such crucial abbreviations as &#8220;rpblcn prty&#8221; and &#8220;ambdxtrs&#8221; obsolete.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://joehankin.com/blog/2008/08/word-of-the-day-brand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
