<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Word of the Day: Outtro</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joehankin.com/blog/2006/12/word-of-the-day-outtro/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joehankin.com/blog/2006/12/word-of-the-day-outtro/</link>
	<description>Now 30% Less Fun!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:19:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://joehankin.com/blog/2006/12/word-of-the-day-outtro/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 19:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joehankin.com/blog/?p=24#comment-15</guid>
		<description>&quot;Middle eight&quot; is common -- it comes from the days of 32-bar songs like &quot;I Got Rhythm.&quot;  Lots of people still use it (including Morrissey, in the lyrics of &quot;Tomorrow&quot;) despite the fact that the modern bridge isn&#039;t bound by those constraints.  &quot;Normal&quot; is a relative term.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Don&#039;t get me wrong, &quot;coda&quot; has its place, but it&#039;s highly specifically defined -- &quot;outtro&quot; is an umbrella term that I find much more useful.  I&#039;d say the fact that you use it for all those various purposes makes you more of a serious musician, not less so -- but not, y&#039;know, one of those Carnegie Hall types.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Middle eight&#8221; is common &#8212; it comes from the days of 32-bar songs like &#8220;I Got Rhythm.&#8221;  Lots of people still use it (including Morrissey, in the lyrics of &#8220;Tomorrow&#8221;) despite the fact that the modern bridge isn&#8217;t bound by those constraints.  &#8220;Normal&#8221; is a relative term.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, &#8220;coda&#8221; has its place, but it&#8217;s highly specifically defined &#8212; &#8220;outtro&#8221; is an umbrella term that I find much more useful.  I&#8217;d say the fact that you use it for all those various purposes makes you more of a serious musician, not less so &#8212; but not, y&#8217;know, one of those Carnegie Hall types.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: god</title>
		<link>http://joehankin.com/blog/2006/12/word-of-the-day-outtro/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>god</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 19:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joehankin.com/blog/?p=24#comment-14</guid>
		<description>not to drop names or nothin&#039;, but when i played guitar w/ billy corgan, he called the bridge a &quot;middle eight&quot;, referring to the fact that it came in the middle and was usually eight measures. he also said it was &quot;normal&quot; for the middle eight to be in a completely different key from the rest of the song. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;do YOU, being a SERIOUS musician, use &quot;coda&quot; and &quot;fine&quot;? and don&#039;t classical musicians write sectionally too? although i think theirs is more like... focused to building to a climax; obviously, they have no use for verse/chorus/verse/bridge/chorus/outtro or whatever.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;i use &quot;outtro&quot;, and i use it similarly when referring to something completely different from the song, or when it&#039;s just a repeated measure. does this mean i&#039;m not serious??!!?! fuck fuck fuck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not to drop names or nothin&#8217;, but when i played guitar w/ billy corgan, he called the bridge a &#8220;middle eight&#8221;, referring to the fact that it came in the middle and was usually eight measures. he also said it was &#8220;normal&#8221; for the middle eight to be in a completely different key from the rest of the song. </p>
<p>do YOU, being a SERIOUS musician, use &#8220;coda&#8221; and &#8220;fine&#8221;? and don&#8217;t classical musicians write sectionally too? although i think theirs is more like&#8230; focused to building to a climax; obviously, they have no use for verse/chorus/verse/bridge/chorus/outtro or whatever.</p>
<p>i use &#8220;outtro&#8221;, and i use it similarly when referring to something completely different from the song, or when it&#8217;s just a repeated measure. does this mean i&#8217;m not serious??!!?! fuck fuck fuck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
